Every year, the nation eagerly awaits the presentation of the central financial budget by the finance minister in the Parliament. One of the key elements of the budget is the allocation for Defence Ministry as part of the “Defence Budget”.
This budget is particularly allotted to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and is largely an indicator of the mitigation of challenges towards National Security. The “Defence Budget” therefore covers five major areas of allocation, these being, Capital Acquisition, Sustainment/operational readiness, pay and allowances, pensions, and expenditure for civil organisations under MoD.
The two major elements can be broadly classified as “Capital Budget” and “Revenue Budget”.
Threat Perception
Before arriving at a realistic allocation for the “Defence Budget” it would be necessary to highlight our current threat perceptions and capability development to cater for both internal and external threats.
The geopolitical challenges of global conflicts will also have an impact on supply chains and availability of raw materials/MRO support, which would then impact the allocations made.
It therefore goes without saying that conflicts in Ukraine, West Asia and other regions will impact energy prices and availability of critical components of military hardware and therefore need to be factored in as opportunity costs. Considering the prevailing situation in Bangladesh and the North-East apart from the situation on the Northern Borders, the finance minister has her task cut out.
The present equipment profile of the Field Army is 68% vintage, 22% current and 8% state of art. Any combat force which must stays relevant in the current times will need to progress to augment its State of Art military equipment profile capability to a minimum of 20-25%
Key Areas for Emphasis
Taking into account our present level of operational preparedness as well as the above outlined threat perceptions certain key areas for emphasis are being highlighted.
Force Restructuring and Optimisation: The Indian Army is undergoing a transformation to become a more technologically advanced force. The year 2024 was therefore declared as the year of “Technology Absorption” and the current year will focus as “Year of Defence Reforms”, leading to what we aspire to taking shape in 2025. A few pointers on the basis of this assessment are;
Modernising Equipment: The present equipment profile of the Field Army is 68% vintage, 22% current and 8% state of art. Any combat force which has to stay relevant in the current times will need to progress to augment its State of Art military equipment profile capability to a minimum of 20-25%. Taking this as a benchmark, the perspective planning must be formulated to achieve this in a maximum period of five years progressing on a yearly road map.
The concept of war fighting has undergone a sea change, wherein there is a greater emphasis on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The use of air power along with rocket and missile artillery with extensive employment of drones must be factored in all war plans and should be a part of our Military Doctrine.
The existing Military Doctrine 2018 would therefore need to be revisited. The need to have a comprehensive air defence umbrella like the one employed by Israel is a “MUST HAVE”.
There would also be a need to augment our cyber and space capabilities. How this can be done will need detailed working. Dependence on DRDO cannot be exercised any longer
Technology: It is no rocket science to assume that the existing holding of our vintage equipment will need upgrading with latest technologies like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, machine learning, robotics, and hypersonic, just to name a few.
There would also be a need to augment our cyber and space capabilities. How this can be done will need detailed working. Dependence on DRDO cannot be exercised any longer.
The private sector along with academia will need to be a part of this journey. Hence, would like to see a higher allocation in the budget towards research and development. The present allocation of one percent will certainly not suffice.
Replacement of Ageing Equipment: The air force chief has amply highlighted this aspect. We may need to augment our existing artillery platforms such as Vajra K9 SP Gun, ATAGS Howitzer as well as inclusion of light tank Zorawar, Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicles (FICV) and others. We need to have sufficient numbers of these in a shorter time frame.
The reduced lead time of availability of these equipment in the requisite numbers needs to be ensured. The onus of manufacturing must shift from Government to the Private Sector.
Building Critical Infrastructure: The concept of fighting a short, swift war has become history. The wars of today are being fought over larger duration as evident from Russian-Ukrainian conflict as well as Israel-Hamas operations.
The need to build a surge capacity in our defence eco-system is a pre-requisite. This would entail holding pre-determined reserves of ammunition, weapons, engineer equipment etc.
This would need infrastructure in the forward areas as well as in the hinterland through MGO works. The requirement of under-ground storage in forward areas is an inescapable requirement.
The allotment of funds to Border Roads Organisation (BRO) from the existing 6,500 crores is also warranted. It is largely expected that this should be increased to a minimum 10,000 crores.
It is visualised that the defence budget 2025-26 would cater for at least 2 lakh crores for capital acquisition, an increase of 28,000 crores from the present budget
Expectations from the Defence Budget
Considering all the above outlined factors, we should expect to see an enhanced allocation towards capital acquisition and infrastructure development.
Towards this end it is visualised that the defence budget 2025-26 would cater for at least 2 lakh crores for capital acquisition, an increase of 28,000 crores from the present budget.
BRO should see an increase of 3,500 crores and be pitched at 10000 crores. The allocation of Research and Development especially to the Private Sector should see an enhancement to at least 25000 crores.
The budget related to the revenue expenditure as well as pay and allowances including pensions will probably see a marginal increase.
Overall Assessment
It would be a reasonable assumption to see a 5% increase in the defence budget from the allotment for 2024-25, which was pegged at 6.22 lakh crores i.e. an increase in excess of 30000 crores largely towards capital acquisitions.
Therefore, we could realistically assume a defence budget allocation of around 6.52 lakh crores with capital acquisition of around 2 lakh crores. This would bring us to about 2% of our GDP. Beyond this we should not be much hopeful.
-The author retired as Major General, Army Ordnance Corps, Central Command, after 37 years of service. A management doctorate and expert on defence modernisation, he is the author of four books, including the Amazon bestseller “Breaking the Chinese Myth,” and a frequent media commentator. He is affiliated with several leading defence and strategic studies institutions in New Delhi. The views expressed are of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of Raksha Anirveda
